With the update of "Runway to Recovery" by the U.S. DOT, DHS, HHS late last year, government agencies hope to provide airports, airlines, and passengers with the most current guidelines for safe air travel, and give each party an understanding of the need for cooperation and individual accountability. < Back Civil Aviation The United States Framework for Airlines and Airports to Mitigate the Public Health Risks of Coronavirus By Daisuke Takagi With the update of "Runway to Recovery" by the U.S. DOT, DHS, HHS late last year, government agencies hope to provide airports, airlines, and passengers with the most current guidelines for safe air travel, and give each party an understanding of the need for cooperation and individual accountability. Download the Report

On July 9th, President Biden announced his "Executive Order on Promoting Competition in the American Economy" to bolster competition in industries where certain companies dominate the market. The executive order covers a wide range of industrial fields, including technology, health care, agriculture, manufacturing, and transportation, and gives the government agencies in charge of each field some specific instructions for promoting competition. < Back Tourism & More President Biden's "Executive Order on Promoting Competition in the American Economy By Tetsuhiro Nakagawa On July 9th, President Biden announced his "Executive Order on Promoting Competition in the American Economy" to bolster competition in industries where certain companies dominate the market. The executive order covers a wide range of industrial fields, including technology, health care, agriculture, manufacturing, and transportation, and gives the government agencies in charge of each field some specific instructions for promoting competition. Download the Report

Toward the Spread and Expansion of Sports Culture Tourism < Back

JITTI Journal March 2021 Back to All JITTI Journals March 2021 Feature Article Legislation Amending the Japanese Civil Aeronautics Act to Implement Small UAS’s BVLOS Operations Over People by Yoshihiro Fujimaki 1. Background and Overview The bill to amend the Japanese Civil Aeronautics Act, which will allow for a small Unmanned Aircraft System (sUAS) to operate beyond visual line of sight (BVLOS) over people, was submitted to the National Diet of Japan on March 9th, 2021. At present, in cases when someone in Japan would like to operate sUAS beyond visual line of sight, he/she must get individual approval for that operation. In addition, operations flown over people (third parties) are prohibited. On the other hand, in 2017, Japanese industries and the government collaboratively developed the “Roadmap for the Aerial Industrial Revolution,” which was intended to develop technology and improve the overall environment for safe utilization of sUAS. This roadmap has been revised each year, and in the latest version, the target date of implementing BVLOS operations over people was set for FY 2022 (by March 2023). Based on this roadmap, the Japan Civil Aviation Bureau (JCAB) of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT) has been studying necessary regulatory changes for implementing such operations, and submitted the bill to amend the Japanese Civil Aeronautics Act to the Diet. This bill also aims to make the current regulatory framework more efficient. For these purposes, the bill includes two new regulatory content, a sUAS type certification / airworthiness certification and a sUAS pilot license. 2. sUAS Type Certification / Airworthiness Certification In the Japanese Aeronautics Act, manned aircraft and sUAS are clearly distinguished, and currently there is no regulation regarding type certification / airworthiness certification for sUAS. The bill will establish such certification. There will be two classes of the sUAS type certificate / airworthiness certificate: 1st class and 2nd class. For operations which will be flown over people (third parties), which are currently prohibited by the law, sUAS will be required to have a 1st class sUAS airworthiness certificate (and a 1st class sUAS pilot license). For operations which will not be flown over people, sUAS will still be able to be flown based on individual approval for each flight, and will not be required to have any class of airworthiness certificate. However, in the case that someone would like to perform a BVLOS operation that does not fly over people, he/she will not need to get individual approval IF the sUAS has either class of the sUAS airworthiness certificate AND the pilot has either class of the sUAS pilot license, which is described in next section. The relationship between sUAS type certification and sUAS airworthiness certification is the same as that for manned aircraft; a sUAS manufacturer will apply for a sUAS type certification for a type of sUAS, and once it is certified, sUAS airworthiness certification inspections that are typically needed for every sUAS will be partially or totally omitted for that type. The above figure is reprinted and translated from the interim report published by JCAB on March 8th, 2021 ( https://www.mlit.go.jp/policy/shingikai/kouku01_sg_000288.html ) 3. sUAS Pilot License In addition to sUAS type certification / airworthiness certification, currently there is no regulation regarding sUAS pilot licenses, and so the bill will establish two classes: 1st class and 2nd class. If a pilot plans to operate sUAS over people (third parties), a 1st class sUAS pilot license will be required. If he/she does not plan to operate sUAS over people, the sUAS pilot license will not be mandatory. However, as described in the previous section, in the case that someone would like to perform a BVLOS operation, but not over people, he/she will not need to get individual approval IF the sUAS has either class of the sUAS airworthiness certificate AND the pilot has either class of the sUAS pilot license. Also, the bill will approve private training organizations for sUAS pilots. Once a pilot has completed a course at an approved training organization, the test for the sUAS pilot license will be partially or totally omitted. In addition, he/she must take a course at an approved training organization every three years for license renewal. The above figure is reprinted and translated from the interim report published by JCAB on March 8th, 2021 ( https://www.mlit.go.jp/policy/shingikai/kouku01_sg_000288).html ) 4. Effects From Its Implementation In FY 2019 (from April 2019 to March 2020), the number of sUAS operation approval applications submitted was 48,364, and the breakdown of approvals is shown in the next figure. (Please note that one application may include several approval items.) Most approvals are related to night operations, BVLOS operations, operations near people or buildings, and operations in densely populated areas. For these operations, individual approval will not be necessary IF the sUAS has a sUAS airworthiness certificate AND the pilot has a sUAS pilot license. The above table details information from material that JCAB submitted to the council on Nov. 19, 2020 ( https://www.mlit.go.jp/policy/shingikai/kouku01_sg_000281.html ) On the other hand, some sUAS operations, such as those conducting around airports, flying above 150m altitude, transporting hazardous material, etc., will remain subject to individual approval. Operations by the sUAS which weigh over 25kg will also remain subject to individual approval.

MaaS in Urban Tokyo by Daisuke Miyamoto < Back

JITTI Journal September 2023 Back to All JITTI Journals September 2023 Feature Article The Current Use of Metropolitan Airports during the First Summer Vacation after the Covid Pandemic and the Latest Initiatives at These Airports By Tetsuhiro Hagiwara Introduction The rush of people spending their summer vacation abroad peaked at Narita Airport on August 10. The departure lobby was crowded from the early morning with families carrying suitcases in anticipation of the first Bon period since the Coronavirus pandemic was designated as a "Class 5" disease under the Infectious Disease Control Law. On May 8, 2023, the Japanese government shifted the infectious disease status of the Coronavirus from "new-type influenza and other infectious diseases (equivalent to category 2)" to "category 5 infectious diseases" under the Infectious Diseases Control Law, finally eliminating the restrictions that had been in place until then, such as the constraints of going outside and wearing a mask indoors for those infected or in close contact. While Japan is flooded with foreign tourists who have returned to the country as a result of the elimination of border control measures, momentum for Japanese people to take their long-awaited overseas trips during this summer vacation is also gaining. In this article, I would like to take a look at the usage of airports in the Tokyo metropolitan area during the summer vacation (Bon period) after the Coronavirus pandemic and the efforts of non-aeronautical revenue businesses at Haneda and Narita airports to improve earnings post-COVID. 1. International Flight Usage during the Dummer Vacation Period at Airports in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area (Haneda and Narita) On August 25, the Tokyo Regional Immigration Services Bureau announced preliminary figures for this year's Bon period (August 10-20) showing that Haneda Airport had 575,940 inbound and outbound passengers and Narita Airport had 802,740 inbound and outbound passengers during the same period. Compared to 2019, before the Coronavirus pandemic, the number of daily passengers at Haneda and Narita airports recovered to 99% and 69% of their pre-COVID levels, particularly at Haneda Airport, which has finally returned to its pre-pandemic level after a long passage of time. A breakdown of passengers at Narita Airport shows that while the number of daily inbound and outbound passengers recovered to the same level compared to 2019 for foreigners, the number of Japanese was at about 50% of the level of 2019. It appears that overseas travel is still a challenge for Japanese after the Coronavirus pandemic. One reason for this may be the recent relatively high airfares and the declining purchasing power due to a weakened JPY. According to airline companies, many overseas airfares are up 20-40% on many routes compared to pre-pandemic. This is due to soaring energy prices following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, as well as the yen's depreciation from around 106 yen to the dollar before the pandemic (August of the 2019) to around 145 yen at present. Crowded departure lobby at Haneda Airport with people heading overseas. (Image Source: Mainichi News) 2. Efforts in Non-aeronautical Revenue Businesses at Haneda and Narita Airports to Improve Profitability As mentioned above, the number of foreign visitors to Japan is finally returning, but airport revenues were damaged to an unprecedented degree by the Coronavirus pandemic. During the three years of COVID, what measures have struggling airport companies taken to survive in the midst of deteriorating profitability and record deficits? The airport itself is a place for extraordinary experiences Narita Airport: Bus tour in restricted area Green Port Agency, a group company of Narita International Airport Corporation, is offering a "Narita Airport Special Bus Tour" at Narita Airport. The tour includes a close-up look at aircraft in a restricted area where a variety of aircraft from around the world reside, as well as a 360° panoramic view of the cargo area, maintenance area, and 60-meter-high Ramp Central Tower. The event also provides a unique opportunity to see the behind-the-scenes of Narita Airport, including a photo tour with a famous photographer and a tour of the JAL maintenance hangar. Narita Airport Special Bus Tour (Image Source: Green Port Travel ) Haneda Airport: Aircraft Cruise Tour from Tokyo Bay At Haneda Airport, Haneda Passenger Service Co., Ltd. operates the "Under Jet Cruise", a group company of Japan Airport Building Co. The service offers an extraordinary cruise experience on a boat in Tokyo Bay, where passengers can enjoy close-up views of aircraft takeoffs and landings. The Haneda Airport Under Jet Cruise (Image Source: Japan Airport Building Co., Haneda Passenger Service Co., KM Corporation ) Other non-aeronautical revenue business Narita Airport: "+NRT factory," a brand of local products linked to the area surrounding the airport In March 2023, Narita International Airport Corporation announced the launch of "+NRT factory," a brand of local products in cooperation with the surrounding area, to develop and sell new products such as local confectionery and gourmet foods, with the aim of communicating the charm of the region to the world. We can look forward to the development of new products based on the theme of "excitement" that is unique to Narita Airport. (Image Source: Narita International Airport Corporation) Haneda Airport: Large-scale complex facility "HANEDA INNOVATION CITY Haneda Mirai Kaihatsu Corporation (an operating company in which nine companies have invested) announced the completion on June 30, 2023 of "HANEDA INNOVATION CITY" (abbreviated name: HICity), a large-scale complex facility being developed in a public-private partnership with Ota Ward in the Zone 1 development project on the former Haneda Airport site adjacent to the airport. The grand opening of the entire facility is scheduled for November of this year. HICity is Japan's first smart airport city, which will generate exchanges that transcend the boundaries between "cutting-edge" and "culture" and create new value. The building will house a variety of facilities, including research and development facilities, offices, an advanced medical center, an event hall, accommodations, Japanese cultural experience facilities, and dining facilities. It is expected to become a center for the creation of new business and innovation through the gathering and exchanges of people, goods, and information from Japan and abroad. (Image Source: Haneda Mirai Kaihatsu Corporation) 3. Efforts at Haneda and Narita Airports to Achieve Carbon Neutrality While the movement to promote carbon neutrality is accelerating in various countries and sectors around the world, in Japan, the revision of the Civil Aeronautics Law and Airport Law, which went into effect in December 2022, includes the promotion of decarbonization in the purpose provisions of both laws. In this context, I would like to introduce new initiatives at airports in the Tokyo metropolitan area (Haneda and Narita). Narita Airport: Establishment of Green Energy Frontier Co. Challenge to decarbonize energy supplied to the airport by 2050 Narita International Airport Corporation and Tokyo Gas Co., Ltd. have established Green Energy Frontier Corporation to supply energy to Narita Airport and began operations on April 1, 2023. The company plans to invest 100 billion yen by 2050 through the construction of a new energy plant and the installation of a solar power generation facility, the largest of its kind in the world at an airport. The company intends to be the first in the world to build a "decarbonization model for airports" at Narita International Airport that combines environmental friendliness and resilience, and to apply this technology and know-how to urban development and industrial parks in the airport's vicinity. Rendering of the new plant Image of solar power generation equipment (Image Source: Narita International Airport Corporation, Tokyo Gas Co.) Haneda/Narita Airports: Promoting the Use of GPUs. Contributing to decarbonization by reducing aircraft "idling" on the ground Haneda and Narita airports have announced that, beginning this spring, they will raise restrictions on the use of APUs (Auxiliary Power Units), which are used to provide the electricity and air conditioning needed by aircraft parked at the airports, to the strictest level in Japan, and will further promote the use of GPUs (Ground Power Units), which have higher CO2 reduction effects, to help decarbonize the airports. The use of GPUs will reduce CO2 emissions to 1/15 or less (in the case of a Boeing 777) compared to the use of APUs, thus contributing to the promotion of decarbonization at airports in the Tokyo metropolitan area. Conceptual Diagram of GPU Supply (Image Source: East Japan Civil Aviation Bureau, Narita International Airport Corporation) Conclusion 　 According to the Quarterly Air Transport Chartbook, released August 31 by the International Air Transport Association (IATA), air traffic across the industry will recover to about 88% of 2019 levels in the second quarter of 2023 compared to the same period in 2019, with the short-term outlook for total passenger traffic returning to 2019 levels in early 2024, It is expected to double by 2040. In Japan, the number of daily passengers during the summer Bon period has recovered to about 100% of the 2019 level at Haneda Airport and 70% of the 2019 level at Narita Airport. Furthermore, with there also being reports that the ban has been lifted for group passengers from China, which had a significant impact on the Japanese inbound economy before the pandemic, the long period of receding demand and deteriorating profitability caused by the Coronavirus is finally coming to an end. Airport operators are working to diversify their revenue sources by expanding their non-aeronautical revenue businesses, such as making the airport itself a place for extraordinary experiences and adding commercial facilities, and this trend is expected to continue in the future. This article focuses on the initiatives at Haneda and Narita airports, but we will continue to introduce new initiatives at various airports in the future, including those in other countries. References : ■Mainichi News https://mainichi.jp/articles/20230810/k00/00m/040/223000c ■Haneda Airport Summer Passenger Volume Estimates http://www.tiat.co.jp/news/cf560f0fcc77f831b332cb51259adfcbb157dd5a.pdf ■Narita Airport Summer Passenger Volume Estimates https://www.naa.jp/jp/docs/20230803_ryokyakusuikei.pdf ■Narita Airport Special Bus Tour https://nrttour.gpa-travel.jp/skybus2023-3/ ■Haneda Airport Under Jet Cruise https://www.tokyo-airport-bldg.co.jp/site_resource/whats_new/pdf/000013474.pdf ■+NRT factory https://www.naa.jp/jp/docs/20230317_NRTfactory.pdf ■Haneda INNOVATION CITY https://www.tokyo-airport-bldg.co.jp/site_resource/whats_new/pdf/000013575.pdf ■ Green Energy Frontier https://www.naa.jp/jp/docs/20230220_jigyokaishi.pdf ■Further promotion of GPU use https://www.naa.jp/jp/docs/20230323_GPU.pdf

Japan's Response to Aviation Accidents as Seen in the Haneda Airport Ground Collision Japan's Response to Aviation Accidents as Seen in the Haneda Airport Ground Collision By Tetsuhiro Hagiwara 1. Overview of the ground collision between a JAL aircraft and a Coast Guard plane at Haneda Airport On January 2, 2024, while Japan was still in the midst of its New Year holidays, shocking news broke out about an aircraft catching fire at Haneda Airport. Japan Airlines (JAL) Flight 516 landed at Tokyo International Airport (Haneda Airport) and a Japan Coast Guard (JCG) aircraft waiting to take off collided on the runway. This is the first total loss of a JAL aircraft in Japan in 15 years and 2 months since the failed landing of FedEx Flight 80 in 2009, and the first loss of a JAL aircraft in 38 years and 5 months since the crash of Japan Airlines Flight 123 in 1985. This accident caused a great shock both in Japan and abroad because the Noto Peninsula earthquake of 2024 had just occurred the day before, and the Coast Guard aircraft that caused the accident was on its way to assist with the earthquake relief efforts, and it was a major accident right after the New Year. A total of 379 people, 367 passengers and 12 crew members, were on board the JAL aircraft. The aircraft caught fire violently after the collision, but all on board were able to escape under the guidance of the crew. On the other hand, the Coast Guard plane had six people on board, five of whom were killed and the captain seriously injured in the collision. The accident forced a rethinking of aviation safety initiatives and post-accident responses. (Image Source: NIKKEI) 2. Accident circumstances and causes The Accident Investigation Committee is currently investigating the cause of this accident, but the following describes the circumstances of the accident and the cause of the accident as far as the media reports. JAL516, the airplane involved in the accident, departed New Chitose Airport at 16:00, 10 minutes behind schedule, and was expected to arrive at Haneda Airport at 17:40. A 1.6 meters per second (3.1 kn) westerly wind was blowing at Haneda Airport at 17:30, and the visibility was 30 km at 17:54. Flight 516 circled over Chiba Prefecture and descended over Tokyo Bay directly over Runway C. Approach At 17:43, ATC instructed Flight 516, which was approaching Haneda Airport for landing, to continue approach to Runway 34R (Runway C) and transmitted information on wind direction and wind speed and departure aircraft. At 17:44, ATC informed Flight 516 that the runway was clear for landing and the wind speed information was transmitted, and Flight 516 recapitulated the information. Flight 516 then continued its approach for landing. At 17:45, ATC instructed Mizunagi 1 (a Coast Guard aircraft) to proceed to C5, the stop position of Runway C, and to indicate Order No. 1. Mizunagi 1 correctly recited the instructions and thanked ATC for giving it priority in the takeoff order. However, Mizunagi 1 did not follow the instruction to proceed short of the runway, and entered the runway beyond stop position C5 before stopping. Collision At around 17:47, about 40 seconds after Mizunagi 1 stopped on the runway, Flight 516, which had permission to land, landed on Runway C. Almost as soon as it touched the ground, the nose of Flight 516 hit the vertical tail of Mizunagi 1 from almost directly behind, causing a fire column. The captain of Mizunagi 1 reported to the Japan Coast Guard after ejection that "the rear of the aircraft suddenly exploded," and the flight crew of Flight 516 stated in their investigation that "we did not feel anything unusual until just before landing, but it looked like something crossed over just before impact. After the collision, Mizunagi 1 exploded and caught fire on the spot, and Flight 516 skidded approximately 1,700 meters with smoke and flames and veered off to the right side of the runway. According to the flight crew, the brakes, rudder and steering wheel did not work during this time, and the aircraft felt as if it was sliding. Passengers in the cabin reported hearing a "crash" with an impact that "lifted them off their backs." The lights went out, and about a minute later white smoke filled the cabin along with a burning smell. Ejection At the front of Flight 516, which had stopped by the side of the runway, the cabin crew informed the flight crew of the fire and advised them to evacuate the aircraft, which the captain then instructed them to do. At the rear of the aircraft, the cabin crew decided to evacuate the aircraft because the in-flight intercom had failed and they could not communicate with the cockpit. Some of the passengers on board screamed and shouted, "Please get me out of here," and "Why don't you just open the door?" but most of the passengers remained calm and did not panic. Since the announcement system malfunctioned due to the collision, the cabin crew guided passengers by calling out with their voices and using megaphones, and about 6 minutes after the collision the emergency escape slides on the forward port (Doors L1, R1) and aft port (Door L4) were deployed to avoid the four middle emergency exits and aft starboard (Door R4), which were unusable due to fire among the eight emergency exits. After completing the emergency checklist, the captain and others entered the cabin to look for and evacuate the few remaining passengers, and all 379 passengers survived, with the captain ejecting last at 18:05 from emergency exit L4, When the passengers were evacuated, about 10 ANA ground handling staff members rushed to the scene and responded in a flexible manner. It was announced that two pets were included in the checked baggage of the JAL aircraft, but could not be rescued. Meanwhile, on Mizunagi 1, although the captain was seriously injured, he escaped on his own. The other five crew members, however, were confirmed dead due to general contusions from external shocks and other causes. Fire Extinguishing Immediately after the accident, once a fire had been confirmed, more than 100 fire trucks were dispatched to extinguish both aircraft that were in flames, of which the fire on Mizunagi No. 1 was extinguished around 8:30 pm. The JAL aircraft had both engines and the underside of the fuselage on fire, but the flames soon spread, and five minutes after the captain disembarked as the last individual, flames engulfed the top of the fuselage and spread to the cabin, causing the entire aircraft to catch on fire. In order to extinguish the fire, a large number of water tankers were deployed, and a special vehicle called a "Super Pumper" was used to pump seawater from Tokyo Bay and discharge it to secure a large amount of water for firefighting. As a result of the firefighting efforts, the fire on the JAL aircraft was almost completely extinguished at around 12:10 a.m. on the following day (March 3) and extinguished at 2:15 a.m. The fuselage of the JAL aircraft was almost completely destroyed except for its wings, and the Coast Guard aircraft was also completely destroyed. (Image Source: NHK (Originally from the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism)) As mentioned above, the cause of the accident is still under investigation, but the following is known. On the night of the accident, the captain of the Mizunagi 1 explained to the Japan Coast Guard that he had obtained permission for takeoff before proceeding onto the runway, but according to communication records between the two aircraft and the tower released the day after the accident, the Japan Coast Guard plane had been issued instruction to proceed to the stop position before it entered the runway, which was recited by the Coast Guard pilot before the accident. It is possible that the JAL aircraft did not see the Mizunagi 1 when it landed, and either the Mizunagi 1 made a mistake in its stop position or mistakenly thought that it had been given permission to take off after the JAL aircraft landed with the instruction of "number 1," the order of takeoff. On the other hand, the JAL aircraft was instructed to enter the runway. It was also subsequently given permission to land. The direct cause of this accident was that Mizunagi 1 entered the runway without permission. However, many questions remain, including: Why did it misunderstand ATC instructions and enter the runway? Why did it not realize that Flight 516 was about to land? Why did ATC not realize that Mizunagi 1 had mistakenly entered the runway? Why didn't the flight crew of Flight 516 detect the presence of another aircraft on the runway? 3. Response to the accident by related organizations Tokyo International Airport (Haneda Airport) All runways at Tokyo International Airport were closed by around 18:00, and more than 100 fire trucks were deployed to extinguish the fire. The Japan Coast Guard dispatched patrol boats and special rescue teams, and the Tokyo Fire Department dispatched a total of 115 units. DMAT (Disaster Medical Assistance Team) was also dispatched. The runway closures were lifted around 21:30, except for Runway C where the accident occurred. Government of Japan The Government of Japan established an Information and Liaison Office in the Crisis Management Center of the Prime Minister's Official Residence at 18:05. Prime Minister Kishida gave instructions to "work closely with relevant ministries and agencies and make every effort to rescue and save the victims" and "immediately assess the damage and strive to provide appropriate information to the public.” Prime Minister Kishida also expressed his condolences to the five Coast Guard officers who died in the accident, saying, "It is a great pity that these officers were killed in the accident, as they were performing their duties with a high sense of mission and responsibility for the areas and people [affected by the earthquake].” Tokyo Metropolitan Police Department The Metropolitan Police Department has established a special investigation headquarters at the Tokyo Airport Police Station, and is conducting an investigation, centered in the Special Crime Investigation Section of the Investigation Department, from the viewpoint of filing a charge of manslaughter in the line of duty. They have begun inspecting the scene and interviewing some of the injured passengers. The Coast Guard captain is also being interviewed at the institution where he is currently hospitalized, and the content of his communications with air traffic controllers are being investigated in detail. In addition, autopsies have been performed on the bodies of the five Coast Guard officers who died in the accident, and it was determined that the cause of death was a total body contusion caused by strong external pressure or impact. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT) The Civil Aviation Bureau of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT) notified the Japan Transport Safety Board (JTSB) of the accident. Director General Shigenori Hiraoka of the Civil Aviation Bureau stated that the cause of the accident "will be investigated by the JTSB and related agencies.” The JTSB is taking the lead in the investigation, and since the JAL aircraft was made in France, Airbus, the manufacturer of the aircraft, and the French Aviation Accident Investigation Agency (BEA) each sent their own expert teams to the accident. The Federal Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (BFU) of Germany, one of the designing countries, and the British Air Accident Investigation Branch (AAIB), which is the manufacturer of the Rolls-Royce engines, also participated in the investigation. Since the Coast Guard plane was made in Canada, the Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB) joined the investigation, along with representatives and technical advisors from de Havilland Canada, the manufacturer of the airframe, and Pratt and Whitney Canada, the manufacturer of the engine. The day after the accident, they waited for dawn to begin a full-scale investigation. All black boxes were recovered from both the Coast Guard and JAL aircraft by the 6th. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) of the United States also participated in the investigation, since the cockpit voice recorder on the Coast Guard plane was manufactured by Honeywell and other equipment by L3 Harris Technologies, both of which were made in the United States. The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT) has set up a "Haneda Airport Aircraft Collision Countermeasures Study Committee" of experts, and held its first meeting on January 19. The committee intends to compile an interim report on measures to prevent recurrence by this summer. Ultimately, the committee will take drastic safety measures based on the results of the investigation into the cause of the accident by the National Transport Safety Board, which is being conducted concurrently (Table 1). Table: Major actions taken by the government to prevent recurrence 1/2/2024 Aircraft collision occurs on a runway at Haneda Airport Investigation by the National Transportation Safety Board and investigation by the Tokyo Metropolitan Police Department commenced 1/3 MLIT instructs airline companies and air traffic control agencies to ensure basic operations 1/6 Assigned a full-time person to constantly monitor radar information at Haneda Airport control The National Transportation Safety Board recovered the flight recorders and voice recorders of the two aircraft by this date 1/9 MLIT announces emergency measures 1/19 Held the first meeting of the Haneda Airport Aircraft Collision Countermeasures Review Committee 2024 summer Countermeasures Review Committee to compile measures to prevent recurrence And after Take drastic safety measures based on the National Transportation Safety Board's investigation report (Prepared by the author based on news reports) Airline Company Passengers on the JAL plane were told that JAL would pay 100,000 yen to each of them as a lump-sum condolence payment and checked luggage reimbursement, and that any more expensive checked luggage would be handled individually. ANA gave 2,000 yen for food and drink to passengers whose flights were delayed to Haneda the day after the accident. Response by Other Transportation Agencies Since this accident occurred during the year-end and New Year holidays, it hit the peak of return traffic. Therefore, the following measures were taken by transportation companies. Each railway company also responded by operating a number of extra services, including the Shinkansen bullet train. JR Tokai, concerned about congestion in the Tokyo metropolitan area and the Kansai region due to the accident, increased one round-trip "Nozomi" Tokaido Shinkansen train that departs from Tokyo Station and Shin-Osaka Station after 21:40 on the 2nd as a temporary service. In consideration of the fact that the last trains had already departed on all railroad lines in the Tokyo metropolitan and Kansai areas upon arrival, train hotels were also provided at Tokyo and Shin-Osaka stations until the next morning. From the following 3 days onward, the number of "Nozomi" trains departing from Tokyo Station was increased. JR Hokkaido and East Japan Railway also increased the number of extra limited express trains from Sapporo Station and one each of the Tohoku and Hokkaido Shinkansen trains to Tokyo connecting from the extra limited express trains at Shin-Hakodate-Hokuto Station. Keisei Electric Railway, which has a line connecting to Narita Airport, was concerned about diverts and congestion to the airport due to the accident, and temporarily increased the number of access express trains from Narita Airport Station to Keisei Ueno Station via the Narita Sky Access Line at 25:00 on the 2nd. JR East also delayed the departure time of the last train on the Narita Line Airport Branch Line for the same reason. Kanto Railway also operated a temporary bus service to Ishioka Station on the JR Joban Line to accommodate passengers diverting to Ibaraki Airport. Nagoya Railroad also operated a temporary train to accommodate passengers diverting to Chubu International Airport. Keihin Electric Express Railway, which has a line connecting to Haneda Airport, increased several temporary trains including limited expresses from Haneda Airport to Shinagawa Station after the normal closing of trains from the 4th to the 8th. Tokyo Monorail also increased the number of temporary trains on the 4th and 5th. On February 27, the Kanto District Transport Bureau of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism presented letters of appreciation to transportation companies that responded to the accident by increasing the number of extra trains and buses and dispatching more cabs. 4. Media coverage and evaluation of the accident Evaluation of the Escape of All Passengers All 379 crew members and passengers on board the JAL flight succeeded in escaping from the accident, which was reported as a "miracle" by CNN and other international media. CNN, in particular, attributed the success to the thorough safety measures and actions taken in accordance with the training that had been amended after the crash of JAL Flight 123 in 1985, and Kuniko Miyajima, executive director of the 8.12 Liaison Committee, which consists of the families of the victims, expressed the same view through a newspaper interview. JAL President Yuji Akasaka also commented, "The crew really did a good job in achieving the results of their regular training. I think that perhaps they were able to produce results that were even better than their training. I am truly convinced that this result was made possible only with the understanding of our customers." Koji Shibata, president of ANA Holdings, also expressed his appreciation and admiration for the crew, saying, "I think this was truly professional work. Note that half of the nine cabin attendants (CAs) on board were new hires who had joined the company in April 2023. It was observed that many of the crew members had just received training and were able to faithfully apply the results of their training, and that the fact that the passengers calmly followed the crew's instructions contributed to everyone's escape. Evaluation of JAL's In-flight Safety Video Five years prior to the accident, JAL had updated its in-flight safety videos in conjunction with the introduction of the Airbus A350, and the successful evacuation of the passengers in this accident brought the safety videos into the spotlight. In recent years, an increasing number of other companies in the industry have introduced unique safety videos that guide passengers to tourist attractions in their home countries or introduce facilities and equipment in conjunction with traditional performing arts and sports. However, JAL did not take the risk of incorporating these unique approaches, and instead used a CG animation format based on and improved upon the old video. When JAL had an engine fire at New Chitose Airport in 2016, a passenger tried to escape with his/her baggage against cabin crew's instructions, and the crew was unable to assist in evacuation due to the time and effort required to pick up the baggage, resulting in three injured passengers. After the accident, JAL included in its old safety video the prohibition of taking baggage off the plane and the request for passengers to assist in evacuation under the slide. Three years later, a new video was produced that stated, "Please do not carry baggage when evacuating! (Leave your baggage when you evacuate!)," the video more strongly prohibits the taking of baggage during an emergency evacuation, and visually explains the risks involved in doing so. In this accident, which occurred eight years after the 2016 incident, all passengers and crew aboard the JAL aircraft were able to survive, despite the fact that the aircraft was so badly damaged that it burned to the ground. One aviation expert highly praised the safety video, attributing the success of the escape in part to the video's detailed explanation of the emergency evacuation. 　 (Image Source: JAL) Reactions to the Accident’s Response The Japan Federation for Aviation Safety (JFAS), an organization of civil aviation professionals in Japan, issued a statement on January 3 urging the press and social networking service users to exclude speculation and imagination and to use only accurate information in their communications. JFAS also announced that the Metropolitan Police Department will investigate the aviation accident from the viewpoint of filing a charge of manslaughter in the line of duty, that the results of the TSC investigation will be used as evidence in a criminal investigation and trial, and that the persons involved will be punished in criminal court. The committee strongly requested that the investigation of the cause of the accident be prioritized over any criminal investigation. ALPA Japan, a federation of Japanese aircrew labor unions, also issued a statement urging that, in accordance with Annex 13 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the accident investigation, which aims to prevent recurrence, be separated from judicial and administrative procedures such as criminal investigations that impose guilt and responsibility, and that any information disseminated be only confirmed facts. The statement also repeated this sentiment regarding information dissemination, and also emphasized that easy dissemination of information be strictly avoided. 5. Conclusion The author flew from Haneda Airport to Washington DC the day before this accident, and was greatly shocked by the serious accident that occurred the following day. I would like to express my deepest condolences to the five Coast Guard officers who lost their lives in this accident, and offer my prayers for their repose. The accident also brought to light the challenges facing the Japanese aviation industry. Immediately after the accident, many experts called it "an accident that would not have happened under normal circumstances," but it was the result of a complex combination of many factors, including the Coast Guard aircraft's accidental runway incursion, the air traffic controller who missed the Coast Guard aircraft, the JAL pilot who did not notice the Coast Guard aircraft, and various background factors that led to the accident, all which must be resolved. The direct cause of the accident will be investigated by the Japan Transport Safety Board, but as has been reported in some media, measures to prevent recurrence, both in terms of hardware and software, are urgently needed after uncovering the hidden factors behind this accident, such as reducing the burden on air traffic controllers at overcrowded airports and introducing next-generation air traffic control systems. Finally, the most important lesson to be learned from this accident is to "instill a culture of aviation safety.” As evidenced by the "miracle" of the escape of all passengers on the JAL flight, the Japanese airline industry has a high sense of mission and professionalism for safety that is among the highest in the world. It is sincerely hoped that this culture will continue to be maintained in the future, and that all parties involved will share a common awareness of safety and take appropriate measures. The airline industry will continue to focus on safety more than ever and do its utmost to prevent the recurrence of accidents. References: https://vdata.nikkei.com/newsgraphics/haneda-runway-collision/ https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20240102/k10014307191000.html https://www.aviationwire.jp/archives/295451 Back to All JITTI Journals May 2024 Feature Article

As drones and other small unmanned aircraft are more widely manufactured, organizations have begun the formal process to receive aircraft certification in order for them to have greater usage in operations, including UPS and Amazon. This report explains the draft of safety standards released by the FAA in late 2020 to better measure design and testing of said aircraft. < Back Civil Aviation Publication of Draft Safety Standards for Small Unmanned Aircraft By Yoshihiro Fujimaki As drones and other small unmanned aircraft are more widely manufactured, organizations have begun the formal process to receive aircraft certification in order for them to have greater usage in operations, including UPS and Amazon. This report explains the draft of safety standards released by the FAA in late 2020 to better measure design and testing of said aircraft. Download the Report

JITI 2015 Cruise Workshop Exploring the Japanese Cruise Industry's Potential June 11th, 2015 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 1779 Massachusetts Avenue N.W., Washington, D.C. Since 1990, the number of cruise ship passengers around the world has increased at a rate of about 7 percent annually -- from 4.5 million to approximately 20 million in 2012. Over 50 percent of this growth has occurred in the United States. While there is a corresponding increase in demand for cruise travel in Asia -- including in China -- the number of cruise ship passengers in Japan has remained relatively flat. How do we advance cruise travel in Japan in the midst of a cruise travel boom? In this workshop, JITI heard from cruise and tourism industry experts from the United States and Japan. They will look at future prospects for the U.S. and Japanese cruise industries. Please join us for this interesting discussion about the cruise business, and how Japan can leverage demand to boost the nation's tourism industry. Opening Remarks Taro Kobayashi Senior Representative, JITI USA Keynote Speeches Katsuhisa Seki Management and Development General Manager, JTB USA Bob Rose Business Development Manager, Princess Cruises and Cunard Line

An Introduction of Japanese Tourism Initiatives During the Pandemic < Back

Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) at Expo 2025 Osaka, Kansai, Japan < Back

JITTI Journal January 2019 Back to All JITTI Journals January 2019 Feature Article Capacity Enhancement of Narita International Airport by Daisuke Takagi 1. INTRODUCTION According to the air transport demand forecast made by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT), demand at metropolitan airports is expected to reach near the limit of currently planned capacity in the early 2020's. On this account, MLIT established the "Metropolitan Airports Capacity Enhancement Technology Subcommittee" consisting of academics and experts under the Basic Policy Subcommittee of Aerospace Caucus, Council of Transport Policy, which compiled possible technical options for further capacity enhancement of the metropolitan airports, and announced them in July 2014. Among the proposed options, construction of the 3rd runway, extension of Runway B, and relaxation of restrictions on night flights in Narita International Airport have been discussed for realization at a four-party council (MLIT, Chiba prefecture, 9 municipal governments around Narita Airport, and Narita International Airport Corporation (NAA),) since September 2015. At the four-part council meeting that was held in March 2018, we reached a final conclusion as to our proposal on further capacity enhancement. 2. NRT’S CURRENT SITUATION AND FUTURE VISION (1) Current situation At Narita Airport, Open Skies facilitated an increase in the number of destination cities as well as the participation of new airlines, and domestic flights also increased because domestic LCCs started to use Narita as their hub. With these developments, understanding and cooperation from the local residence made the increase of departure and arrival slot limits to 300,000 annually and introduced flexibility in late night flight restrictions and non-stopping of automobiles at the airport area gates. As a result, the volume of foreign visitors and domestic travelers has increased substantially, and Narita Airport is contributing towards the development for our nation to become tourism oriented. It is the air transport demand from Asia that will drive growth of the world airline market in the future. The competition for attracting air transport demand from Asia has already begun. Major Asian and Middle Eastern airports are presently growing rapidly by capturing the growth of the Asia market, including freight demand. In this situation, Narita Airport is no exception to being in severe competition with other major Asian airports. The major airports in the Asia region will carry out large scale capacity expansions between 2017 and 2019, which is anticipated to further intensify the competition for attracting flight routes among international airports in the years to come. (2) Future Vision The number of aircraft arrival/departure slots (domestic flights + international flights) at Greater Tokyo Capital Area Airports is expected to exceed the currently planned capacity in FY2022 in the strong and moderate growth projections, and in FY2027 in the low growth projection. (The number is expected to reach 780,000 to 940,000 in FY2032.) According to the demand projection made by the government and NAA, the number of aircraft arrival/departure slots at Narita Airport is expected to exceed 300,000 a year in the 2020's, and reach 500,000 a year from the early 2030's to the late 2040's. Furthermore, according to demand projection made by NAA, at the time the annual number of aircraft arrival/departure slots reaches 500,000, the annual number of passengers is expected to become 75 million, and the annual air cargo volume is expected to become 3 million tons. (Results in FY2015 are; 235,000 arrivals/departures, 38 million passengers, and 2 million tons of air cargo volume.) 3. NEW RUNWAY PLAN AND RELAXATION OF RESTRICTIONS ON NIGHT FLIGHTS (1) New runway plan For the reasons mentioned above, Narita Airport needs to secure the sufficient departure and arrival slots required to further the capacity enhancement measures for Greater Tokyo Capital Area airports. With regard to specific locations of Runway B and C, Runway B will be extended northward so that the missed approach area of Runway B will not overlap with Runway C. Also, we will make adjustments so that the layout plan conforms to the plans for construction of the Metropolitan Inter-City Expressway (Ken-ou-do). It is necessary to expand the airport site by 1,000ha in order to make the 500,000 annual aircraft movement per year available. Considering the designated city planning area and the residential area in the surrounding area of the airport, the candidate area for an expanded airport site will be as follows; (2) Relaxation of restrictions on night flights In order to prepare to offer a flight schedule to suit the airline business demand in the future, Narita Airport has made a case study of the flight schedules that would need time slots during the late night and early morning. The data for this case study was based on the 500,000 annual traffic movements of aircraft as was discovered through hearings with airline companies. As a result, it was confirmed that making operating hours from 4:00 pm to 2:00 am is ideal to further enhance capacity at Narita Airport without falling behind in the competition with other airports. However, due to the nature of Narita Airport being an inland airport, we have received many opinions and demands from residents during explanatory meetings, and the Chiba prefectural governor and the liaison council of local governments in areas around Narita Airport have requested MLIT and NAA to review the proposal twice. Under such conditions, the four-party council meeting held in March 2018 reached a final agreement on a proposal that makes operating hours from 5:00 pm to 12:30 am, which ensures that quiet hours under the flight routes will be kept at 7 hours. Since the relaxation of restrictions on night flights will put a heavy strain on the local residents, NAA has proposed countermeasures against night and early morning flights, such as installation of internal windows in bedrooms and a limit imposed on equipment for flight operations during late-night and early-morning hours, in addition to taking conventional environmental action. 4. TOWARD THE FUTURE (1) Future schedule of further capacity enhancement Further capacity enhancement will go through the following steps in the future: Temporary relaxation of restrictions on night flights will be implemented in advance at Runway A for the Olympics and Paralympics in Tokyo, while procedures for extension of Runway B, Runway C, etc., will be promoted promptly. (2) Effects of further capacity enhancement By increasing the departure and arrival slot capacity of Narita Airport and capturing the growth of economically developing Asian countries through further capacity enhancement, Narita Airport is expected to see significant increase of passengers and cargo volume, and will bring about various positive effects in areas around the airport, such as industrial development, infrastructure upgrades, and the improvement of living environments.